home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_74 / 74r036.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  80KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | windowpane
OCR: discrimination under subscction (b)(1} by complctely ex empting large amonnts of personal property. The broad language of subsection b4 was intended precisely pre: vent such actions, and shouid be given full effect. cause the statute can achievc 1ts objective under re spondents' interpretation, the argument petitioner and its amici that the Court should construe the language mote "natrowly accommodate conccrns of federalism mis placcd. the antithesis. of "fair" reading pf the stat ute to interpret that does accomplish ts stated goal Sco Morales Trans World Airtines, Itc. 112 Ct 203i 2036 1992 In short, as the plain language, purposc. and legislative history of subsection {b}(4 make clear the subsectian can only be understood as catch all designed tc prevent states from shifting fram discri ...